The Committee for Advanced Therapies (CAT) scientific recommendations on classification is a procedure at the European Medicines Agency (EMA) designed to help developers determine if the product they are developing is an Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product (ATMP) and if so, which type of ATMP it is. This procedure answers on a case-by-case basis the question of if a medicinal product answers the scientific characteristics of an ATMP in regards to EU legislation (Regulation (EC) n°1394/2007 on ATMP and Directive 2009/120/EC amending Annex I of Directive 2001/83/EC). This procedure has been established to support the development of ATMPs, in accordance with Article 17 of Regulation (EC) N° 1394/2007.
According to this article 17 of the ATMP regulation, scientific recommendation on ATMP classification is available for “any applicant developing a product based on genes, cells or tissues”. The EMA will deliver a recommendation after consulting with the European Commission (EC) and within a 60-day period from receiving a valid request.
The CAT is the EMA’s committee in charge of providing advice on whether a product falls within the definition of an ATMP (Article 23b) of Regulation (EC) No 1394/2007).
The result of the recommendation on advanced therapy classification for each request is made public in a summary provided by the EMA except for the parts that are protected by commercial confidentiality. The list of medicines that the CAT has assessed and recommended classifying as ATMPs or not since March 2019 is available here on the EMA website.
Looking at the previous CAT scientific recommendations on ATMP classification is helpful in order to know whether the medicine being developed is an ATMP or not. Nevertheless, given that the classification as an ATMP impacts on the applicable regulatory pathways, and the sub-type of ATMPs impacts on the applicable guidance, it is strongly recommended to apply for a CAT scientific recommendation on ATMP classification. This is even recommended in case of high doubt on the classification. Moreover, a strong incentive is that this procedure is free of charge. This classification can also allow developers to access other existing incentives, such as support for medicines that fall into the category of ATMPs.
The CAT scientific recommendations on ATMP classification are not binding as long as changes in the product development (e.g. new substantial manipulation of the tissues and cells in the product development) may impact on the classification.
Despite not being binding, CAT scientific recommendations on ATMP classification are generally followed by National Medicines Agencies: e.g. the CAT recommends that the product is an ATMP. But it is prepared on a non-routine basis. The relevant National Medicines Agencies will consider to apply the ATMP hospital exemption pathways if the conditions are met.