Skip to main content

Regenerative medicine and regulation: what's GMP got to do with it?

GMP stands for “Good Manufacturing Practice”. GMP is a quality assurance tool. It is used across a range of industries, including medical and food manufacturing. GMP is intended to ensure that production is consistent, and that products are controlled to state-of-the-art quality standards appropriate to their intended use. GMP principles significantly contribute to providing consumers and patients with products with a consistent quality and high safety level. 

But what has that got to do with regenerative medicine? Well, quite a lot if you want to bring a promising therapy from the laboratory to patients. But does regenerative medicine fall under the pharmaceutical law?  

The answer is yes. In December 2008, the European Commission enforced the “Regulation on Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs)” as overarching legislative ordinance. The ATMP Regulation classifies gene therapy, somatic cell therapy, and tissue-engineered products (including stem cell-based products as pharmaceuticals when intended not for research but for human use.

What is GMP and why do we need it?

Good Manufacturing Practice guidelines set out quality control standards for the manufacturing of medicinal products. They aim to ensure that pharmaceuticals, such as pills or vaccines, have consistent strength, purity, and quality. GMP guidelines cover quality assurance measures for all aspects of manufacturing. This includes: 

  •  premises 
  • equipment and staff training 
  • to operational processes 
  • packaging and storage conditions 
  • overarching quality assurance and documentation systems. 

For example, specific GMP chapters address the requirements for the air of a clean room, whereas other parts target all materials and reagents used in the production of a particular drug. It also specifies how far a manufacturer must be able to trace back the source of each ingredient in the final product and, of course, how final testing of the product is performed before release. 

GMP guidelines are exactly that: they are guidelines, not laws. Most countries have passed laws making it compulsory for pharmaceutical companies to follow established GMP guidelines. For Europe, the EU GMP guidelines are publicly available. It is important to emphasise that the GMP system is integrated into several other measures aiming to protect the health of patients and consumers, meaning us! 

However, new scientific and technical developments like stem-cell-based therapies also raise new challenges for regulators. GMP regulations must be constantly adapted, or even newly developed, to meet the progress in the field, the characteristics and the risk profile of these innovative investigational products. 

Picture of a person wearing goggles, gloves and a clean suit, using a pipette to trnsfer liquid from one container to another with their forearms inside a sterile laminar flow hood.

Current GMP guidelines and regulations are based on quality principles that have been established for pharmaceutical and healthcare manufacturers for over 50 years. Now, the emergence of regenerative medicine concepts raises new questions on how to achieve adequate safety and quality standards. 

This is especially challenging as regenerative medicine products often involve new biotechnological techniques like tissue engineering, genetic modification or sophisticated cell-culture techniques. Even more important is the fact that a product comprised of living cells or other fragile biological compounds cannot be standardised in the same way as a conventional pill. 

Picture of a person wearing goggles, gloves and a clean suit, opening a freezer shelf
Cells are stored in freezers under controlled conditions in GMP facilities

 

For example, researchers are investigating the possibility of using MSCs to treat certain severe diseases, e.g. Graft versus Host disease (GvHD). The MSCs can be obtained from the bone marrow of a related or non-related human donor (allogeneic) or the patient themself (autologous), and are isolated and expanded in cell culture. Here GMP intends to stipulate relevant quality parameters that must be met before such cells can be used to treat patients  

These parameters include: 

  • Absence of infectious disease, microbial contamination and process-related impurities must be demonstrated. 
  • Content and functionality of the cells in the product during its shelf life before it reaches the patient is measured. 
  • Every result is documented and stored in a way that traceability is ensured, which is important in case adverse events potentially assignable to the product occur. 

Detractors of GMP criticise the extremely high costs of establishing and maintaining a GMP system. Especially in early development, when only a few batches of an investigational product for testing in a low number of patients are produced, setting up a GMP-compliant process significantly contributes to the overall costs and slows down developmental timelines. For developers – especially universities and small-medium sized enterprises (SMEs) and start-up companies – this might lead to financial risk or even abandonment of the project. As a result, this could cause delay or even a halt in development of novel treatment options for patients. Therefore, the GMP compliance status must be adjusted carefully, taking into account the developmental stage and the risk profile, but also therapeutic innovation, potential benefit and medical need. 

Picture of a person wearing goggles and a clean suit, inspecting the read-out on an incubator
Equipment such as this incubator must be installed, checked, calibrated, monitored, cleaned and maintained as part of GMP

 

Who makes the rules?

Different regulatory bodies around the world provide GMP guidance. For example, in Europe the EU, in consultation with the relevant authorities of the Member States and the European Medicines Agency (EMA), sets up the legislation and provides subsequent guidelines, whilst the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is responsible in the USA. Many other countries use GMP guidelines provided by the World Health Organization. All agencies aim to make sure only safe and effective products are produced and released. Often, this is not a black or white scenario, as the regulators have to balance potential risks against the likely benefits and improvements of a particular therapy or drug for the public or an individual patient. This requires sound scientific evidence about the safety and effectiveness of therapies. 

Close-up photograph of a transparent, membranous material in a petri dish being lifted using tweezers

Did you know?

Several companies and universities developing stem-cell- or progenitor-cell-based therapies have already achieved GMP compliance, meaning that they are officially supervised and allowed to produce their respective cell products. Most of these are still intended for use within clinical trails, but one stem-cell-based medicinal product, Holoclar® for the repair of damaged corneas, was granted a marketing authorisation in the EU in 2015. Worldwide, currently a handful of stem-cell-based products hold a marketing license for their respective countries.

Keeping regulations up-to-date

GMP regulations and guidelines need to be updated regularly to keep pace with scientific and technical developments. Updating or drafting new guidance involves consultation with many different stakeholders, from manufacturers to clinicians, researchers and patient groups. In 2017, the European Commission published guidelines on GMP for Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products to establish the parameters for the development of these innovative therapies. 

Did you find the content on this page useful? If not, you can leave us a message so we can improve Send us your thoughts